A whole two hours!Mikado14 wrote:As a matter of fact I am not. You appear to be quite intelligent but you feel that the only way to make your point is via sarcasm. My intent originally was to get into the the order of harmonics but you are the one that got defensive with the sarcasm.Justice League wrote: Yes you are correct and becasue you are correct everything i have to say is completely wrong. Satisfied?
Justice League wrote: COnsidering you haven't heard any of my evidence that Cathie was on to something - you are correct. I am so sorry i troubled you, you really know your decimal points and cycles and first order harmonics - so I will have to defer to your knowledge of these things since you are an expert- clearly.
Are you thick? What do you think I have been trying to do? Do you think I have an enormous amount of time to go and read about Cathie? I spent over two hours reading about this man's postulations, theories or whatever you wish to call them and all you can do is use sarcasm and direct it to the forum in general.
Again, sarcasm, but you have asked a question. My question was directed to draw you into a discussion of the order of harmonics that Cathie was talking about. I was talking the order of harmonics as to wave propagation as in transmitters, oscillators, etc. to see what your answer would be and you responded that the first order would be 70. I went and reread Cathie and I think you should as well.Justice League wrote: But just one question, how does your question pertain exactly to the evidence you have yet to hear and to cathie's theories being correct or not? LOL - I am really stupid , please enlighten me.
Again, I will talk no more, I am now running, I am a coward for I dislike sarcasm that is dripping and the use of vulgarities to explain oneself. I am sure that those traits afford you enormous opportunities in business as well as life.
Best
Mikado
What you don't know and fail to realize is that the government pulled his book off the shelves and made him reprint some of his data and his other stuff, precisely so that certain information would not be released during the cold war, when his book Harmonic Conquest of space was printed in 1969. I caught this and called - or rather emailed him about these errors and after some heated convesations realized what I just told you and what he said in his chapter on Cayce in particular - but don't take my word for it go and read it.
So this is part of the reason so many scoff at this work, becasue in certain places it is purposefully wrong - but if you spent more than 2 hours researching the reasons for this, you would know that or figured out that something was amiss.