Elizabeth Helen Drake wrote:You guys.
Why is it that Sean Connery has gotten even more handsome in his older age and the girl on the beach has just gotten .... older .....? Elis.zabeth
His plastic surgeon brings advanced techniques back from the future.
Seriously,
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2157975.stm
Project Grasp
Boeing Phantom Works
Im drawing blanks trying to find connections between Penney and gravity effects of nuclear weapons. I have long believed that emp is a manifestation of it, but that is a belief.
The old issue of gravity acting instantly implying a connection between all mass mediated by "something". (Commonly illustrated with spheres resting on a sheet of clear plastic, saying gravity was the dips forms in the plastic caused by the weights of the balls and saying that gravity was the distension of time/space represented by the plastic. But that isnt it.
Mass ceases to be mass in a nuclear reaction. Mass becomes energy. Energy doesnt result in gravity. Hence as mass converts to energy according to E = MCsquared, gravity snaps off for that mass. This results in a negative impulse. And this manifests as emp as a result of a harmonic of the gravity pulse. There are difficulties in that, because if gravity can pulse it means gravity waves exist - as a mode of transmission. And therefore gravity isnt transmitted instantly. However there may be more than one mode of transmission.
The problem also consists of this. E = MCsquared .
M = E/C squared .
C is a very big number. It takes an awful lot of energy to make a little mass therefore. It takes a little mass to make a lot of energy.
One would think therefore that the emp from a nuclear explosion would be very little. But it is very powerful. The fuel for a fission bomb might weigh 4 kg. The vast bulk of it remains as mass after detonation. Only a small fraction has been converted to Energy according to E=MCsquared.
The emp is a wave. Im sure Penney was into it, but the search is complicated by his study of gravity waves - that is, the study of waves affected by gravity. The term gravity wave also refers to the waves which transmit gravity - and that is a long term search in progress by some scientists. The confusion of the two activities having the same name makes a net search quite tedious.
It seems to me that conventionally the only practical uses of
E = MCsquared (and its obverse) acknowledged by science are nuclear weapons and nuclear reactors. It seems to me one could briefly define suppressed science as "that which puts forward new practical applications of mass/energy conversions anticipated by Einstein".
Of course though, if gravity was resultant from a singularity underlying "time-space" then gravity would be everywhere at once. And so the emp of a nuclear blast could be seen as a manifestation of a disturbance, an oscillation in time-space as result of its relationship to the underlying singularity.
I have a headache. I can find nothing re Penney and emp. But he was a "wave" man. And we know emp exists. Could it possibly be that the conversion equation for gravity and electro magnestim is an obverse analog of the conversion equation for mass energy?
Brown's effects manifest beyond a certain voltage threshold? An analog of the critical mass needed for mass/energy conversions?
If everything is made the same "stuff", manifesting either as mass or energy; or ; gravity or electromagnetism, then what is the proper word for "stuff"?
does electromagnetism of certain parameters manifest as gravity in the presence of mass? So humans belief gravity is the result of mass rather than as the result of a relativistic conversion equation where mass becomes the constant in place of the speed of light thus:
G = em M where G is gravity and em = electromagnetism and M = mass constant.
Resulting in the transposition: em = G/M
And M is the determining constant describing the relationship between gravity and the universal electromagnetic field.
if mass and energy are the same stuff in different relational states, then is the relationship between gravity and em is of the same relationship?
This would tend to explain the huge emp emitted by a nuclear device even though the conversion of mass to energy is so little (quite minute really in fission) in such a device.
IF conventional science first saw this in the era of 39 - 45, then the secrecy surrounding those events provides the cover. And if its a cover, if the science is in the black, then was Brown seen as a threat to it?
Twigsnapper presents information which leads to the conclusion that Penney was deliberately delayed in his arrival at the Nagasaki blast until such time as the blast had passed. The physical effects of this blast Penney could predict mathematically. Was he delayed until the emp had passed?
emp is now a weaponised effect of these weapons (Princeton University site, Glasstone, The Effects of Nuclear Weapons, etc)
emp is a wave. Penney was a wave expert so highly regarded he was awarded the US Medal of Freedom, even though he was not American.
Yet I can find no hits when I search for William Penney and elecromagnetic pulse. yet, being a component of the destructive suite of nuclear weapons effects, this is one area I would have expected a wave expert to have contributed.
http://www.1stardrive.com/solar/