Hey Elizabeth,
Did you notice what else was said? same link (its about a conference just not the recent one, bear with me !)
http://www.padrak.com/ine/INE7.html
Try this on for size:
Looking back at the conference, most of the lectures were concerned with summarizing the known information from Brown's patents and well documented experiments. Very little information was given regarding his private experiments and the vast amount of theoretical ideas and experimental data that he probably has documented in his research notebooks. It was repeatedly suggested that a responsible committee or networking group needs to be setup to be able to go over all of the details in Brown's existing documents to distill what important information may be there. Josh Reynolds, Tom Valone, and myself volunteered to chair this committee and get this investigation going. Since Brown's experiments with disks appeared to be able to defy gravity (somewhat like John Searl's disks), there was some discussion at the conference regarding flying saucers, UFOs, the Philadelphia Experiment, and the Montak Project. While these areas were held as fringe areas at this conference, they could have information that may relate back to Brown's discoveries. In my summary during the panel discussion, I presented my views that: (1) We do not know what T. T. Brown really did, and we need to organize and distribute his patents and materials to a committee (or a company) to find out; (2) Individuals will not be allowed to accomplish much within U.S. - instead we need teamwork, networking, corporations, and an international corporation to distribute results; (3) Commercial applications of any advanced technology were not possible 3 years ago, and should easily be possible now; (4) Existing graduate school textbook theory is not applicable to describe the physical effects seen by Biofield, Brown, William Hooper, and Hans Coler (and others) - we need more data and new mathematical models for dynamic EM interactions; and (5) Strong dis-information will continue to persist, especially the use of simplistic thinking - such as that which comes from the use of Heavyside's simplification of "Maxwell's Equations" into 3-D vector form, and the assumptions of the so-called "General Theory of Relativity."
Individually, we will see the problems and become inspired"
Now, I find that whole section amazing, considering that it was written so long ago. Do any of these people, Valone, Reynolds etc. know of your research Paul. And how is it that if they were so danged interested back then, why didn't anyone approach the family? I understand from what Andrew said, no one bothered. I just find that interesting. Where are these people now? grinder
