Linda Brown wrote:It came to my attention the other day that its been scientifically proven that it takes seven trees to handle the CO2 emmisions for one human...... They don't say what kind of tree or how big it has to be ... which puts my imagination into a quandry. Do Joshua Trees even count? No, probably not. And the Mulberry Trees around my house that have finally reached down past the hardpan and now are into some moist earth .... I have, lets see ... ten of them on this couple of acres. So my husband and I are already four short of having enough to even break us even .....
And that is the quandary isn't it? We are in a hypnotic trance that states that we use more energy to produce the "clean" varity, so there is no net gain. To that I say (something we are both quite familiar with) HORSE MANURE!
A scientist recently came up with a new artificial leaf which oddly looks a little like one of Dads fans miniaturized and I thought... hey, thats cool but still we have the energy requirement... its a an electrical appliance ... that fancy leaf. Daddy preferred the little cactus perched on a stand. He called it the " Green Thumb". Works great. Blow smoke right at it and the smoke .... disappears. Cool to watch.... but still. you have to "Plug it in"
A few solar panels on the roof, a small wind turbine, and silicone salt batteries to store the energy when neither sun nor wind is adequate will solve that need to plugin without burning something.
Maybe its just a dream but wouldn't it be wonderful to have a " machine" for every household that very quietly went about converting what it is able to draw from the "Sea of Energy" around us... into the electricity to power all of the things that we require in our modern lives? Like a sort of heat sink .... the energy just comes to it from another dimension .... Maybe even power those " artificial trees" to turn the balance in our favor, and finally get rid of the residue from all of the coal burning and gas burning energy producers. An electric universe indeed. But ... while we are drawing that energy .... wouldn't someone on the other side notice that his " system" had a power " leak?"
Perhaps that is the shift in the paradigm that I keep bring up. We live with an energy context that says we have to do work to get power. The full extent of your father's gravitator motor can provide that energy without giving anything up to the "laws of entropy." And As moray and Tesla have demonstrated, although most physicists of taoday and those of their times refuse to see it, the energy is truly all around us, we only need to find the "switch" that turns it on.
And I am sure that someone somewhere someday (on OUR side of this strange curtain)will be to the point where they need to see if their plans work. They flip the switch. What happens then? I would bet that whether there is appreciable generation of energy or not .... someone somewhere is going to know that unit was turned on. What will happen then? Do we get welcomed into this new knowledge with all the good stuff ... or do we run into " individuals" who rightly say .... huh ... you are still a little ahead of your time. Sit on this material for a few years ... until its safe to share.
Yes, there will be massive resistance to it. Like that which was alleged by Ralph Ring in regards to Otis T. Carr's "anti-gravity space craft" The "men in black" told him that he was a threat to the economic stability of the United States, and therefore he was to cease and desist all work and all plans and equipment were confiscated in the name of "national security".
And if it hasn't happened to a modern day researcher... I wonder if it happened to Dad very early in his research when he first saw the possibilities of this thing. Is that what earned him a ticket on the Caroline? Linda
Possibly, but that is only if the "other guys" don't get their first. There is a lot of money in oil and in the power industry as it was created by J. P. Morgan and Thomas A. Edison. While some regard Tesla's work a myth, and refuse to accept the wireless transmission of electricity, there have been experiments at MIT that proved the concept, although they still were generating that electric in a "conventional" manner. The news media has reported on "fuel from water" to power vehicles, but a commercial application has yet to be developed, instead it is as Mr Hull tells it, a technology of garage inventors. In fact, there is a web site called Hydrogen Garage, that sells plans and parts, and others who sell books and videos, but the only one that I saw selling a complete kit is being sought after for fraud.
I have a friend and co-worker that installed a hydrogen device on his old Datsun pickup and although it a rather "crude" design, he gets about 10 extra miles per gallon. I am planning on installing one on my Ford Ranger, and like my friend, start out with it supplementing the gas. As I can afford to invest in it further, I plan on adding the necessary hardware to pump hydrogen into the fuel system directly. If that proves successful, then I can easily put a kit together to sell to others. And yes Mr. MiIkado, I will make a few bucks on each one I sell, I am not going to build them and give them away for free. I have to eat and pay for my living expenses, so until such a time as I am financial independent I will have to "earn" a living.
Electric vehicles is THE solution, however until we can provide electric derived from ambient electric or build an alternative solar/wind wireless infrastructure, or at the very least a hybrid design that uses electric full time and only uses a fuel motor to generate power when no other sources are available, we are stuck in the quagmire still.