grinder wrote:So what you are saying Mr. Twigsnapper is that Dr. browns group was so good with the disinformation that they produced and so dedicated in carrying it out that ...... it would still be accepted as the proper history .... like a fine piece of art at a museum ....... unless someone from their group eventually pulled the plug on that disinformation?
Why now though? If this disinformation project has been so successful for so long, why would members of this Group decide to begin the end of it?
Sort of scarey actually. Do they think that we are finally ready for this REAL information? Are we? Thats whats bothersome. I am not so sure!
Whether we are ready or not for the future I think that we are more than ready to find out the truth of the past. Then I guess we will have to decide where to go from there, right?
grinder
What is it about information? We talk about "when it sees the light of day" or "that will be a new dawn". Man always attributes the unknown as in the "dark".
Thy word is a lamp unto my feet.
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Was the author above referring to actual light? or the hiding of some truth.
Lead, Kindly Light, amid the encircling gloom
Lead Thou me on!
The night is dark, and I am far from home—
Lead Thou me on!
Or is the author above on a quest for knowledge?
But then I suppose you could look at the whole disinformation campaign, if there is, as keeping society "in the dark" and if knowledge is light:
Light is knowledge. Light is life. Light is light
A new dawn approaches
Bulwark