Guess he means when a common arithmetic sum (Σ) becomes an integral (∫) of infinite continuity. There is also the enigmatic ⨋ to consider.

David... I believe you attempting to define (or re-define) Euclidean Geometry verses non-Euclidean geometry as it applies to "field tensors"! I believe all of this is covered in Einstein's special relativity and the time Continuity theorem!

If we cannot use any static terms whatsover, there is no foundation at all and the only foundation left -is the definition of time INTERVAL!

This boils down to Minkowski's invariance of the INTERVAL theorem.

See page 37 of this book: SPACETIME PHYSICS by Taylor/Wheeler ISBN 0-7167-0336-x

Here is a scan of the page:

Image

The foundation for this is laid down in the first 36 pages of this book. IT MAKES COMPLETE SENSE and USES ONLY COMMON ARITHMETIC TO DEFINE "dimensions"... ANYONE CAN UNDERSTAND PLAINLY WHAT IS DEFINED AS THE FOUNDATION OF SPACE METRICS and TIME.

The only major point of contention is the Minkowski w quantity which is define as an "imaginary number".

This is where the "Time continuity theorem" begins it's rather complex arguments which are yet to be resolved.

Is this Wilbert Smith?

According to another Canadian named Smith..... "IT" does NOT cause motion, the "operator's mind" causes "It" to have motion.

In other words we may be dealing with a combined "vehicle" AND "communications project" involving "mind over matter".

It could be that you have to build pegassus with whatever it takes to get LIFT only (as in freedom from gravitational pull/push), from then on the control of movement, direction, speed, and perhaps even DIMENSIONAL CONSISTENCY becomes an issue of mind over matter...

As long as we are speculating here, I just thought I might throw that issue in.

As for "breaking the laws of physics". I have done that already in past experiments involving "Shannon Laws" in Communications theory. You are correct. The laws of physics are not laws at all, they are simply challenges for those of us who dare tackle them.

On a more practical aspect, the consensus is that Barium titanate is the best material!!

Trickfox

""further generations" of the high voltage technology which do NOT use thrust technology" would leave only boundary layer effects to work with. I don't see an immediate connection with gravitation.

Mark, I'm just trying to find out if you intend on dealing with some kind of "thrust" action to power pegassus.

Thrust action and boundary layer effects are both affected by high voltage generation and much of the work by Paul Laviolet is pertinent to this discussion.

The bigger question of course is; do you believe there are "further generations" of the high voltage technology which do NOT use thrust technology, -are completely silent, -and create local gravity anomalies which allow the devices to defy momentum laws. If you DO believe these advanced generations of technology exist, -is your project pegassus wholly or partially supposed to present a preliminary design of such advanced technology.

The alternative of course is to forget about the mysterious exotic technology and concentrate on practical technology and materials presently available. Personally I believe the exotic stuff which defies classical physics of momentum and thrust is the result of a breakthrough in material science, and advanced nanotechnology. We may still be 20 years behind the curve on this, and the mysterious silent hovering vehicles that can make 90 degree turns at mach 2 are not within our realm to construct just yet. (MAYBE)

Disguising messages as intelligent noise? Is that not the Pfansteihl mechanism? How did we jump from the Phasorphone to Pyramider so fast?

Looking over the immergence of secret communication systems it would seem that by late 1972, the CIA's concept for a covert intelligence agent communications satellite system had changed dramatically. In addition, the science and technology directorate, and particularly the Office of Special Projects, had taken the lead in designing a totally new system. Such a system was described in a December 14th, 1972, TRW Submission named: "Proposal for a Covert Communications Satellite Study" (source; Wizards of Langley)

Now it seems to me that I have heard of the pyramiders behind this study. They would have needed a unit for sending and recieving anywhere on earth, and it would not have to depend on the presence of some satellite flying overhead for a limited amout of time, like we see in many of the movies these days.

Seems like the NRO would have been involved at some point. The whole system probably sounded like intelligent noise to everyone. I wonder how much of Dr. Brown's communications work may have been involved in this period of the 70s.

Well then here would be a way to take all objective notions at once, and reach the end of the mirror, which I assume is the chiral version of white noise.

What is ZPF?

Einstein has been using Newtonian Mathematics (integrals) and relying on the constances. All of it was based on the law of falling bodies and the formula F=M.A....

What if all of that is wrong or incomplete?

Einstein himself declared his own conclusions to be imcomplete in his famous "EPR paradox".

Then there is the continuing arguments over the "time continuity theorem".

viewtopic. ... lta#p19664

Recently, I came across some math that has crumbled my faith in all of the classical foundations of math.

I came to the conclusions that first order logic has to be re-examined carefully. Last year I started to look carefully at the proposition 1+i=2 in which "1" is THE "primary integer", "i " is defined as "ANY" objective notion, and "2" is really the foundation for "Clifford space" (the proverbial "Alice's looking glass" as it were). I ran beside that mirror for over a year looking to find the edge of it.

(∞)Σ(n=0) 1 + i^n,

Which diverges to ∞.

We can use Zeta function regularization to assign a finite value to this divergent sum, which is what we need for Quantum Theory, anyway.

lim(s->0)(Σ(n=1)^∞ (1 + i^(n - 1)) n^(-s)) = i/2

Interpret i/2 as you may.

Dielectric constants, now called the relative permittivity factor 𝜀r(𝜔), is closely related to the electric susceptibility factor χe, and is a complex-valued function with both real and imaginary parts.Discard all Newtonian notions, re-examin Maxwell/Coulomb law to determin a unforseen relationship for "FORCE" based on dielectric constances. INVENT---or re-invent the math relationships using "proton mass" as the natural reference. Pay particular attention to Rieman's conjecture and the convergence theorem (Zeta function).

𝜀r(𝜔) = 𝜀r′(𝜔) − 𝑖𝜀r″(𝜔),

εr(ω) = 1 + χe.

I will point out that the Riemann Zeta function makes heavy use of Complex i-numbers, but that is all I can say on this. Also note the similarity of the last equation to Raymond's 1+i=2.

Bandwidth should be: DC to daylight.

Timespace equation:

w=(-1)to 1/2 power times t

Delta w=(-1)to 1/2 power times Delta t

(interval of proper distance)squared=(delta x)squared+(delta y)squared+(delta z)squared + (delta w)squared.

MINKOWSKI 1908

Timespace is the Clifford algebra Cl(1,3).

Spacetime is the Clifford algebra Cl(3,1).

I think he is asking if we agree with the use of Cl(3,1) for spacetime. I like JA Wheeler's super-space better. I heard it is related to the Lie superalgebra E10.Jungle lord, may I ask you a few technical questions?

Do you believe without reservation that "Force truly equals mass times acceleration"? In other words : is Newtons foundation for "the calculus" flawless.

I'm trying to look at the foundation for your obviously extensive knowledge base.

Also; Do you agree with the Minkowski equation which defines the time continuity theorem

This may or may not necessarilly be related to the other technical issues you brough up, and I was just wondering.

Nonconscious entities also undergo Lorentz transformations so I'm not sure this statement has any real meaning.

I like this French Canadian a lot. He has made it posible for many people to begin to understand the Lorentz Transformaton and the abstract principles that this strange phenomena propulses our minds into another parallel dimension or "matrix" of quantitative values.

Thank you for sending the link. The two newest prototypes have failed to survive the silicon encapsulation process.

I don't understand why but my prototypes are getting more and more difficult to assemble. Does not help that my hands are not as sure as twenty years ago. It is difficult to assemble very small objects under a microscope.

Ampère's circuital law, which Maxwell derived from standard hydrodynamics, implies that the magnetic field is irrotational, which is a flaw Maxwell had to remove before unifying the E and M fields. Another error Maxwell had to smooth out was the fact that the divergence of the curl of a vector field must always be zero. Divergence free tensors are essential to energy conservation.

Can everyone see that I have trying to envision two planar surfaces (E,&, M scalars)meeting at a single area withing a diaelectric material.

Does anyone else see this picture?

The displacement current that Maxwell added to get rid of these errors receives a nontrivial contribution from the dielectric polarization. The scalar value of the displacement current is written in terms of electric flux:

𝐼D = 𝜀 (∂ΦE / ∂𝑡),

Wherein ε is the permitivity ε = ε0 εr which is the electric constant multiplied by the relative permittivity factor. It is true that ε may be replaced by a tensor in nonlinear dielectric materials, which is why I don't think Raymond should have considered E to be a scalar in his case, quoted above.

BLOMGREN PROBE SPOTTED^^^^^

Is this analogous to the quench time for a spark gap in a Tesla coil? In other words, how fast you can turn off or quench the spark? Now I was going to ask you if you could make an oscillator using a tunnel diode and I see you can. I also learned that they are sensitive to radiation. Which makes sense as diodes are used as detectors in radio frequencies. But are they sensitive to gravimetric radiation as well?

MagicBill

They are if you synchronize the lorentz transformation time sequency. Mess with gravity and you mess with time ..remember?

Maxwell threw quaternions away BTW.

On 14 August 1956, Noyce noted an idea for a "negative resistance diode" in his lab notebook. With most diodes, current increases with increased voltage—the more voltage applied to the device, the more current passes through it.

Indeed Linda, The effect was first noticed by Noyce in 1956, but my guess is that your dad alread knew about all of this and wrote it all down in "the Structure of Space". I'm thinking that he would probably also explain the whole 3-space phenomena, and "the origin" of any EM source radiation.

The other issue is that there has been a lot of in-depth studies into all kinds of semiconductor junctions since the fifties. Nowadays physical juncton attributes are treated at extremely small scales, and material purity has reached enormously important echelons over distances.

Now comes the "Quaternion concept" and the emergence of a hollographic ghost of a universe we call the "Quantum field". Suddeny all this "3-space stuff" gets swallowed up into this grand idea where anything is possible if you can control the curent/voltage through some sort of heterogeneous medium.

^^^^Posted in MJ12 connections.

I see Curis LeMay whom Linda actually met in her youth, and the beginning of Douglas Aircraft company.

Anyone else see the possibility that Rand was a name also conneced to Whitehall Rand

Trickfox

^^^??

Kevin

Did you notice that crest and symbol in dark gold and crimson on the top right side of the webpage in your Dan Burish link. I have seen that crested symbol before. If I remember correctly, It is the symbol which represents a well known secret society. Do you happen to know what I'm talking about?

OSS -> CIA

http://www.archives.gov/research/arc/

Try this: When I searched for the name: Thomas Townsend Brown this list came up.

That means the US government just now confirmed that T.T. Brown was in the OSS.

Trickfox

And the Brown technology is an early form of the Blomgren probe, but still using the same forces.

Haven't we allready established that Peter Wright's toy (the MOP) may have been an early form of sound pick-up device using the forces we are looking at here?

Trickfox

If I had to guess, I'd say they where R A Wilson and R Shea. Two Robs = Two Dobbs.

Trickfox, I have always had the impression is that much of the Ong's hat story,including the twins, was a collaborative fabrication of some brilliant creative people who shared a fondness for certain hallucinogens. They were creating a virtual reality world, before we even understood the term.

rose

Actually,I'm not even interested in the story itself that much. I just wondered if it was determined if the Dobbs twins are REAL people or not.

Oops. Nevermind.

Two young chaos scientists recently fired from Princeton (on a charge of "seditious nonsense"), a brother and sister, Frank and Althea Dobbs.

The Dobbs twins spent their early childhood on a UFO-cult commune in rural Texas, founded by their father, a retired insurance salesman who was murdered by rogue disciples during a revival in California. One might say that the siblings had a head start in chaos - and the Ashram's modus vivendi suited them admirably. (The Pine Barrens have often been called "a perfect place for a UFO landing.") They settled into an old Airstream trailer and constructed a crude laboratory in a rebuilt barn hidden deep in the Pines. Illegal sources of income were available from agricultural projects, and the amorphous community took shape around the startling breakthroughs made by the Dobbs twins during the years around the end of the decade.

^^^The empty tapes that activate a one-time encryption pad in the VAX 11730 system. Did not prove to anybody that Riconosciuto had PROMIS.

If only the world could understand the power others could have abused at that time when I was keeping those PROMIS tapes. Instead I gave them to the house judiciary comittee who were investigating the inslaw scandal and the "Keating five" during the Reagan aministration tactics. The evidence just dissapeared from the public. Here is the last you will ever see of those computer tapes: "sitting on the hood of the car rented by house juiciary committee investigators; ImageOh but it's all Water uder the bridge now right?

Ronald Reagan was a hero.

we don't dare say anything against him, besides... it was Oli's fault!!!

The "cookie cooler" came from the METC unit. So apparently it is not of "any use in generating energy". Then where do we get free energy to reverse Thermodynamics?

Oh yes...I can make a real dangerous bomb the size of a pineappple. Nothing about this technology would be useful in generating any kind of energy. All it can do is make a very big explosion. Othersise, none of the technologies are of any use in generating energy or being creative.(eccept the "cookie cooler" of course) . The truth is that I'm a passifist so I have no interest getting involved in the arms business. The only project will work on now is a communications project

All of you should be listening carefully to Mikado and also looking into "material sciences" The smith chart is used to plot the variable components of certain semiconductor materials which are used in high frequency oscillation and "power transmission" of such frequency oscillations. The physical spacing, contruction, design, tribology, and cassimir effects have to be taken into consideration. In the old days things were artfully constructed then trimmed to their harmonic physical parameters. In modern times we have to deal with quantum effects and other notechnology issues. Back in the 80s we were designing "pixel sized antennna arrays" and these were like flat sheets of dialectric materials covered in a protective teflon.

All this to say that Dielectrics is a far more advanced material science that most engineers and technicians are aware of.

The old days of coil capacitor tank circuits is fine to experiment with and understand the principles. Making breakthroughts however is to push the envelop of the raw material capacities and calculable variable properties. For instance...There is a way to burn a diode junction so that it produces the same tunnelling change every time it cycles through it's parametric frequency reactive qualities, -however the correct frequency must presents itself at the physical node of the semiconductor junction. this becomes a matter of directivity and innertial reference to some local space/mass time base. Like a Neoether.