skyfish wrote:This one will not leave me alone either...
And of course I have come to the realization a very long time ago that what I interpretted as a " dream" so long ago wasn't a simple dream but something far more important. In any case it was a SHARED experience
.
A waking experience, sleeping experience....altered state? A shared experience...dream like quality....
Leesburg...nothing to do with a saucer....receivers...antennae...transceiver....dna...
Kevin, have you been to Leesburg?
skyfish
Skyfish,
He might not have but I have been there. The FAA has a facility there and I was involved in an asbestos removal there. Thank God I'm not there anymore, not because the place wasn't beautiful but I didn't want to be in an asbestos containment in summer in Tyvek suits and a full face powered air purifying respirator (PAPR). And it was about 90°F+ during the time!
There is much I'd like to say but don't have much time to do so. Look before the resistance cross. Dr. Brown's original works in 1937 used an electrometer. The readings are reversed for an electrometer and later on the resistance cross, the 16h ST is a minimum not a maximum as measured before. So pay attention to the devices used. Dr. Brown talks about the original resistance measurements with one copper wire 120cm long. Since 2.54 cm/inch, we're talking a leg less than 48 inches long (47.244 in). Pg 50 he talks about thrust minimum when the electrometer reading is highest. Later he describes the resistance cross.
On Pg 53:
Dr. Brown wrote:Phoned Mt Wilson Observatory to get Ephemeris for 1892. Mrs Henderson reported on 8-21-73 the lunar phases as indicated above. The peaks occur 6 days before full moon in each case. These peaks seem to coincide with instrument minima. In this case, then, the instrument increases torque as resistance (of copper) increases. This is exactly opposite to what might be expected if torque is a function of current.
Now he is back talking about the electrometer.
Dr. Brown wrote:Page 59 To my knowledge, there is no accepted method for measuring the electrostatic potential of the Earth. There is no reference potential. It would be like a mono-polar voltmeter. In the literature, the work of Prof. Fernando Sanford (Prof. Emeritus of Physics, Stanford Univ.) comes to mind. Shortly after 1900, Prof Sanford published "Terrestrial Electricity" (Univ. Series Math. And Astron., Vol. II, No. 1, L.C. QC 806.S3 AS 36L56, Vol. 2, No. 1). In this volume, as I remember, Prof. Sanford conducted investigations with a quadrant electrometer and obtained some striking evidence of lunar electrostatic effects. I am trying to locate this reference at the present time. Sanford reports that it is out of print. L.A. Public Library has misplaced its copy. My program for the immediate future is to concentrate on the possibility that the electrometer is indicating resistance changes. I will be looking for other research and other evidence that include resistance changes which are not accounted for. This is especially important if these changes accompany any of the lunar cycles or are correlated with sidereal time.
Page 60 99. Torque and Resistance Change in the Brown Sidereal Radiation Recorder.Catalina Island; Aug 19, 1973. Since the instrument scale is inverted, and since an increase in torque requires an increase in total current, it necessarily follows that an increase in instrument reading (instrument units) means an increase in resistance. Considering the 1937 (Ganesville) records: (1) Resistance is maximum 2 hr after moon crosses upper meridian
(2) Resistance is minimum at noon, Solar time.
(3) Resistance is maximum at 16 h ST
(4) In all annual charts, "instrument units" parallel "resistance" in direct relationship. If the resistance if a conductor is related to absolute electrical potential and if the potential of the Earth changes, then�
Then what? It just trails off. I went to Andrew's site and then rexresearch.com and they both trail off. Missing data, anyone?
Finally, I wanted to learn more on the Hercules constellation. I found this:
The constellation Hercules is smack in the middle of many famous constellations. He is bordered to the north by Draco the Dragon, to the northwest by Cygnus the Swan, and to the northeast by Bootes the Herdsman. Lyra the Lyre with her bright Vega star flanks Hercules' west side, while the Northern Crown, Corona Borealis, resides on his east. To the south, Ophiucus the Serpent Bearer and his serpent, Serpens, look up to the great Hercules.
Major Stars:
Hercules, in his diamond shape (some believe the constellation resembles a swastika-oops!), has four major stars that make up the four corners of his body. Herculis Zeta, Eta, Epsilon, and Pi are considered the "keystone" stars of Hercules, though they are not the brightest or most massive; they simply hold the corners of Hercules' body and make him easier to find in the night sky.
Now I highlighted Ophiucus the Serpent Bearer and the Serpent is the 13th zodiac constellation. There are 13 zodiacs, not 12 as normally thought. The Serpent is the missing zodiac. There is also a passage in Revelations that talks about the Serpent and it could be a vague reference to this constellation and the "star" wormwood (brown star) which hits the earth. This angle is an extreme southern angle which NASA already admitted may be difficult to detect until it is too late. It would also be with the sun behind it which would be difficult to detect anyway.
Interesting points from all here. I guess we all have been getting heavy downloads...
MagicBill
