kevin.b wrote:As a dowser I know only too well the degree of sceptism in the vast majority of people.
If it is not provable in the confines and boundries of their accepted current laws of physics , and peer reviewed documents, then at best it is ignored.
Perhaps we should list out what is provable within those confines, then seek to prove anything that falls outside of them.
We could perhaps also call things HULL proof, no ship is any good without a sound HULL.
Has this HULL indeed proved to hold water? By what proof has he provided that such science as expounded upon by Drs. Aspden, Brown, Tesla are fallacy?
He has claimed that his yeras of working with fusor technology and Tesla coils provided him with a depth of understanding beyond the gragare invertors, yet he proclaims loudly that such science will not yield anything that can be construed as free energy.
I am constantly bombarded with the most vile and outragious bile, not on here, which is most refreshing and appreciated, but from many quarters, family included.
I am learning to cope, and how to deal with this, it is not easy, there are the most clever wizards of words about.
It should not be under estimated the depth of feelings that are involved, and the lengths that will be undertaken to ridicule this book, especially from a religious angle.
It would seem my good fellow, that you succeeded in achieving that second level of which Mr. Schatzkin has quoted. The violent opposition even though the results prove the method works. Many a well digger here in the US have walked away scratching their heads when such senstive and gifted dowsers have found water when all of the advanced engineering could not.
I was confronted today by a man from virginia, a Jehovas witness, he was none too happy about me, as far as he was concerned the bible was FACT, bizzarely with no proof, but written , according to him by forty men after receiving inspiration from god.
Obviously an ex-convict,and a Roman Emperor, were inspired by god himself to throw out the "laws" given to Moses, and create new ones. After all, Moses was merely a denounced and deposed prince, who by his "fabled" birthright provided him slavery and exile instead of inheritance to become Pharaoh and by decree alone could have granted the people from the "land of Goshen" their freedom from bondage.
You sure do have some bible bashing folks in America?
I tried to talk with him about people in between time perhaps receiving inspiration, and maybe additions and update may be needed to his bible, he didn't like that, he was a walking talking bible, he knew every word and could quote it, amazing.
Someone with such a mindset cannot allow such blasphemy to be truth, for it challenges that very essence of his beliefs.
Then of course you face the new religion of science, again many people can quote every last single law of such, word for word, maths equation after maths equation, and if you dare to venture outside of this, well you are declared a fraud.
As I reread Chapter 50
Structure of Space I see that what Dr.Brown puts forth is much different that the physics taught today. And like I and others here in these numerous forum pages, has offered the foundation in peer review and giants of science to back up his claims. But rather than take up the challenge and provide experiments to challenge or prove such theories, like the Jehovah's Witness that confronted you, so is much scientific endeavor that postulates "a sea of energy" that we only have to discover the secret of turning on its faucet.
New ideas and truths are quite difficult to squeeze through such narrow minds