Page 1 of 1

Questions for Michael re; Lear and Mining Operations

Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 4:25 pm
by Rose
Desertfae has kindly volunteered to get a few questions to Mike R. regarding the mining technology that he was using, which he has said is based on Dr. B's technology. It's easy for things to get lost in the volume of yak here, so I'm starting a placeholder.

Magic would like to have these answered

1. Please have Michael describe his electrostatic device and how it relates to mining.
2. Tell us how it works and why it is better than conventional techniques.
3. I would be curious on voltage/power levels and the amount of ore extracted per kW of energy vs. conventional mining techniques.
4. If there is disintegration or the ore breaking apart due to the atomic binding forces, I would be curious on dust levels generated and how fugitive dust emissions are controlled.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6&start=45

I'm interested in the people side:

5. Was Dr. B. ever in the mine?
6, Did Michael ever meet him?
6. What did he (Michael) think of him?
7. What did they talk about?

Anybody else want to jump in here?
rose

Re: Questions for Michael re; Lear and Mining Operations

Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 3:09 am
by Rose
p.s. she says she will send on ten or so and asks if we can get them together within the next week. I'll give up some of mine to meet the magic number, if anyone has any more questions to add to the list.

Re: Questions for Michael re; Lear and Mining Operations

Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 5:59 am
by natecull
Thanks Rose!
Rose wrote: Anybody else want to jump in here?
8. Was Bill Lear or his company involved at all and if so how?

Re: Questions for Michael re; Lear and Mining Operations

Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 1:49 pm
by Paul S.
I'd be curious what role the word "beneficiation" might have had in all this...

--PS

Re: Questions for Michael re; Lear and Mining Operations

Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 2:11 pm
by Mikado14
Paul S. wrote:I'd be curious what role the word "beneficiation" might have had in all this...

--PS
MarkC from Sat Feb 25, 2006 4:46 pm wrote: and the first thing that came to my attention was a listing of a Canadian patent # 726958 ... that addresses just what we were talking about ....


http://www.rexresearch.com/isotopes/1isotope.htm

Amazing the information that is contained in this forum.

Mikado

PS: Have you validated today Paul?