wdavidb wrote:
Some things don't have answers because we simply don't know.
David
Perhaps you will be surprised to hear me say that nearly everything you said makes sense and is correct. The only thing your are missing are a few ancient secrets like the "Golden Ration", and the comprehension of "Orthogonal Functions".
You see David, you are not alone in your visions. There are others just as smart as you in the world. There people smarter than the both of us who are reading this. They know you are correct to a certain degree, and they know I have the classical proof from my side of our dispute. They understand that your contention is that we need not get any further that 1 & 0 because that is the language of truth in science and technology.
Something is either INCORRECT=0 or True=1, but you know something funny David there is another point of view here called the "social value". Animals cannot understand this point of view but some have still learned how to use it to eat and survive.
It's called DECEPTION. In this universe Things are neither incorrect or TRUE, they can also be meant to be DECEPTION ...- which is some kind of subjective Truth that is "Not REALLY true" but made to look like truth for some immediate and beneficial purpose, (like selling a book for instance).
No person can argue the fact that there exist whole creations of "written knowledge" which have been wasted because they are simply Fraud. The knowledge itself leads to empty promises.
Whenever you challenge established principle you are expected to be examined under a microscope to see if your challenge is also an attempt at Fraudulently benefitting upon the gullibility of the masses.
And also in this universe there a multitude of CHOICES to enable us to take EVERYTHING that is known and combine bits and pieces together to define "PREVIOUSLY UNKNOWN TRUTH" Things that are neither True at the moment of thought, but True at the next moment of realisation. We call them discovery.
I say neither one of us are finished with "Discovery" yet. Your passionate compositions of visionary science may amount to "a book" and a small following of individuals who agree 100% with your terms and definitions, and perhaps I will even learn a great truth from you on how to explain elegantly what Instrument I shall build to control gravity.
The fact is; -that from my point of view what you are attempting to achieve, -is convince everyone that ALL of science is wrong and that you are the only person who sees the truth.
Can anyone else in this forum outrank your definition of plainly understood "words"?
You are telling me that you reject the definitions at the beginning of this thread (Non-Linear Time Field Frequency Acceleration-as explained in Gravity control.org) and base all of your propositions upon your "Statement of Principles" which have no foundations.
That being the case you are placing yourself in the "GURU" position, of your own proper "cult" sir!
But them..... I am still in the stage of discovery. That means I will discover if my engineering of nanotechnology will allow me to create exotic ceramic materials with unbelievably advanced atomic properties that allow me to build "OVER UNITY" energy devices.
You... I suppose will discover how many people will buy your book and continue to entertain themselves on your forum by chatting about non-linear time and frequency confusion.
Is this what "project Unity" is????
Or is it that the
both of US David have to UNITE some how.
I have a lot of difficulty dragging reality in front of people's eyes, because WE have to agree what reality is first.
The Reality is that we need MATHEMATICS to build ANYTHING REAL.
You have admitted that Mathematics is NOT your expertise. OK....Let's get over that part.
Fine.....I jut want to know if you REJECT MATHEMATICS COMPLETELY?????
Do you?
If not then Listen to me as I tell you that your visions DO MAKE SENSE, but you need MATH to make them real.
I am offering to help you reshape your definitions and terms to reflect an independently confirmable technology which leads us into "OVER-UNITY". This is a Principle All of science understands.
You may choose to reject me and I shall meekly bow out of your "Gravity control club".....,
Or you can accept to go over the terms at the biginning of your NTFFA thread (on Gravity control.org) and adopt them as parts of the meaning of the FOUR FUNDAMENTAL DEFINITIONS of (NTFFA) and move on from there and we can LEARN from each other how to prepare the text for a new generation of wondrous technology in communications, energy, and space travel.
Remember David. I am going to physically BUILD something. You may join us or exclude yourself.
Now....... You decide!
(Note this post was copied and reposted in the Gravity Control.org)
Trickfox