To:
[email protected]
09-29-2006
Hi Borbas:
I have been following your work for some time and commend you on
your careful progress in proving that there is a force available
from the isolated positive field potential that causes the overall
enclosed positive field to move in the opposite way that would occur
if ion propulsion were the cause of motion.
T. T. Brown proved the same thing many years ago and he proved it in
a vacume chamber. If anyone reasons correctly, even the most casual
observer would come to the conclusion that motion of a charged
system in opposite direction than required by the ion wind is cause
to consider the result as not due to ion wind.
In my theoretical physics work concerning the H1 atom field, I
discovered that the proton develops a negative energy field and the
electron develops a positive energy field. Thus, if a Van de Graff
generator would be allowed to float in space, when it was turned on,
the whole Van de Graff machine would fly away in a direct line from
the negative part of the machine to the positive part of that same
machine. Further, it would continue to accelerate as long as the
potential at the two opposite ends of the machine were maintained.
The force acting on the machine is due to a negative energy gradient
in front and a positive energy gradient in the back. Nature abhores
a vacume and that applies to a negative energy density. Further, a
positve energy density tends to want to expand to dissipate the
field. The net result is acceleration of the surplus energy field
towards the vacuous energy field, taking the machine along for the
ride.
I consider the so-called aether energy the same thing as my energy
space, wherein that energy space is almost limitless in its content,
is non-lacally connected to all matter in our local universe space
at the same time and finally refreshes all matter in our space in
pulses similar to sequential frames in a movie theater causing the
picture to appear to have seamless continuity.
The design of the particles is in the form of standing waves, and is
mass. The energy field around the charged particle is refreshed from
energy space as needed. Tapping into the field of the proton, or a
building positive field in general, will allow for limitless energy
extraction.
William Lyne, in his book,
"Occult Ether Physics" makes the
following statement concerning the H1 hydrogen atom on page 92:
Gasoline combustion (n-Heptane) 19,314 BTU/lb
Hydrogen combustion (H2+O) 52,200 BTU/lb
Atomic Hydrogen (H2<-->2H) 196,200 BTU/lb
Note that the atomic hydrogen process does not involve a consumption
of the hydrogen. This is because the hydrogen in the monoatomic
state builds the huge output energy while seperated from a partner
atom and when recombined, that energy is released in forming the
diatomic bond. The dissociation energy is 103 cal/gram mole and the
gross heat output is 109,000 cal/gram mole. That leaves a net energy
for each cycle of extraction of 108,897 cal/gram mole. (Page 90)
I have checked his unit conversions against my Mathcad program and
also the energy of dissociation and the covalant bond recombination
energy values against a standard source, "The Elements", Emsley,
Oxford press.
You are stronly encouraged to buy William Lyne's book. I got mine at
Amazon.com. It is well worth the minor expense and is easily
readable.
This is worth experimenting with. Comments please from technical
experts are welcome.
Keep up the good work Borbas!
Respectfully,
Jerry E. Bayles
j.e.bayles@worldnet .att.net
[url]http://www.electrog%20ravity.com[/url]
ELECTROGRAVITY WORKS
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========
--- In newelectrogravity@ yahoogroups. com, "Borb᳦quot; "Mikl��uot;
<borbasmiklos@ ...> wrote:
>
> I recived a letter from Mr. David Thomson, he says
> than my devices can been explained with Aether Physics
> Model. Aether is flow to opposite way! In this case
> Newton is still correct, but my thruster can be used
> to propulsion in space, since Aether is everywhere.
> Presentation of Aether Physics Model:
>
> [url]http://www.16pi2.%20com/files/%20NewFoundationPhy%20sics.pdf[/url]
>
> Mr. Roger Anderton sent me his explanation of Aether.
> His letter:
>
> At
>
> [url]http://www.wbabin.%20net/science/%20anderton2.%20pdf[/url]>
> My paper explains: "The proposal is that - the present
> way that ether is defined by physics textbooks has led
> to confusion and it would not be the way that Einstein
> would have defined it.
>
> Once the ether is defined correctly there is a better
> link between Einstein's physics and the rest of
> classical physics back to Galileo's physics."
>
> I hope so than this information will help to find
> explanation of my thruster.
>
> My thruster:
>
> [url]http://www.fw.%20hu/bmiklos2000/%20unipolar.%20htm[/url]>
> Regards:
> Borb᳠Mikl��r> >
>